This is a default template, your custom branding appears to be missing.
The custom branding should be at https://www.kent.gov.uk/_designs/moderngov/template if you cannot load this page please contact your IT.
Technical Error: Error: The request was aborted: Could not create SSL/TLS secure channel.
Venue: Darent Room, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone. View directions
Contact: Anna Taylor
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of the Meeting held on 3 September 2013 PDF 33 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 1. In response to a query about the letter sent to Mr Vaz the letter would be re-circulated to members of the Panel. POST MEETING NOTE: the letter was circulated to the Panel on 8 October 2013.
RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on 3 September 2013 be signed by the Chairman as a correct record. |
|
Minutes of the Commissioner's Governance Board held on 15 August 2013 PDF 331 KB Additional documents: Minutes:
RESOLVED that ... view the full minutes text for item 44. |
|
Commissioner's Decisions PDF 14 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 1. The Commissioner had taken three decisions in August/September 2013.
2. In response to a question about funding for staffing the Commissioner confirmed that there was one off funding for these short term contract posts to kick start projects.
3. The Commissioner confirmed that the contracts for her two advisers expired at the end of October 2013.
4. In relation to neighbourhood watch the Commissioner explained that the officer would be based in Police Force Headquarters and was managed by the Police Force.
RESOLVED that Members note the key decisions taken by the Commissioner in August/September 2013. |
|
Independent Review of the Youth Commissioner Recruitment Process - to follow PDF 124 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 1. The Commissioner explained that she had wanted this report to be produced by someone with experience, independence and someone that provided good value for money. It had proved difficult to commission someone but University of Central Lancashire had the expertise in their police and criminal investigation department to carry out the review of the Youth Commissioner recruitment process. The review confirmed that it was a comprehensive process, but that it fell at the last hurdle, the Commissioner’s office did not ask for social media vetting and those advising the Commissioner’s office did not advise it. However, the same vetting procedure was used to recruit police officers. A new procedure had been put in place to ensure that anyone applying for a job at the Commissioner’s office would have to give permission for their social network sites to be viewed. The Commissioner assured Members that points around equality and diversity would be made more explicit in the job description.
2. The Commissioner would be recruiting her Youth Commissioner over the coming months but she valued the comments of the Panel and would take any comments on board before the young person was recruited.
3. During the course of the discussion Members made the following comments and received the following responses:
4. Members praised the report and it was agreed that the process was well run and transparent but was the vetting system that was used appropriate? The Commissioner confirmed that in future an alternative vetting process would be used.
5. The Commissioner confirmed that she was still in touch with Paris Brown; that Paris was well and was working with young people.
6. Members raised concerns about the language used when talking to young people and the need to ensure that they understand the significance of comments made in the past. The Commissioner concurred with the views, but had experience of teaching young people and in addition a peer panel had been used in the interview process and social media was discussed and built into the selection process.
7. Members had concerns that the Commissioner was looking for someone who was ‘street savvy’ and by following the new process it was going to prove extremely difficult to find the right person, however a Panel member commented that there was a difference between ‘street savvy’ and having respect for all people in society. The Commissioner confirmed that 30 young people had already contacted her office to express their interest in the role, and the Commissioner was confident that she would find someone who was representative of their age group.
8. Members asked how the Youth Commissioner and his/her family would be supported throughout the process bearing in mind the exposure they would be subject to. This was applicable not only throughout the recruitment process but in the future as well. The Commissioner explained that the concerns were valid and she did delay the announcement of the previous Youth Commissioner to allow for vetting on the individual and checks to be undertaken ... view the full minutes text for item 46. |
|
Future work programme PDF 17 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 1. A Member asked for the opportunity for the Panel to discuss different ways of working with the Commissioner which would provide benefits for the whole of Kent.
2. The Chairman confirmed that he would welcome any suggestions for collaborative working with the Commissioner’s Office and would ask the Officers of the Panel and the Commissioner’s Office to work together.
3. On the point of decision making and the Interim Protocol between the Panel and the Commissioner, it was considered that this should be reviewed by the officers and considered at a future meeting.
RESOLVED that Members note the forward work programme and asks the officers to review the interim decision-making protocol. |