31/03/2026 - 26/00016 - Crisis and Resilience Fund (CRF) 2026-2029 - Delivery Plans

Reason for the decision

 

To deploy the Crisis Resilience Fund (CRF) to provide crisis support to low-income households facing financial shocks, and to invest in services that build financial resilience and strengthen local support networks. The CRF consolidates funding for crisis response and resilience, succeeding the Household Support Fund (HSF).

 

Background

Within the Spending Review in June 2025, the Chancellor announced continued investment to support low income households with the introduction of the Crisis and Resilience Fund (CRF) made available to local authorities in England to support low-income households who encounter a financial shock and to support activity that builds individual and community financial resilience,prioritising resilience services to households that have experienced a financial shock.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is introducing the CRF replacing the Household Support Fund (HSF) and incorporatingDiscretionary Housing Payments (DHP). The fund provides KCC with a multiyear, consolidated grant, enabling a more stable and preventive approach to supporting vulnerable residents.

The funding covers the period of 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2029 inclusive. This includes specified funding for housing support in the third and final year of delivery. In Year 1 and Year 2, Authorities are expected to maintain existing levels of spending on Housing Payments, using the financial year ending March 2026 allocations for DHPs as a guide. From Year 3, District Councils will no longer receive an allocation for The Fund. Instead, all the CRF funding will be distributed to Unitary Authorities.

The fund provides a consolidated, multi-year revenue grant to local authorities. It comprises of four components:

Crisis Payments,

Housing Payments,

Resilience Services, and

Community Coordination.

 

To meet with grant conditions applications for Crisis and Housing Payments must be accepted year-round and via accessible routes (e.g., online, phone, face-to-face). Local authorities retain discretion to define ‘low-income’ locally and to design delivery within national parameters.

 

Options (other options considered but discarded)

 

-      Decline or defer acceptance of CRF – rejected due to loss of funding and inability to meet statutory and strategic objectives.

 

-      Limit scope to Crisis Payments only – rejected as it would not secure long-term resilience outcomes and would risk repeat demand, including demand on statutory services and would not meet all of the four objectives set out by the DWP.

 

-      Deliver wholly in-house without partners – rejected as it would constrain reach and capacity; partnership working is recommended in guidance.

Financial Implications

An Officer ROD Decision OD/26/00005 has been taken, under the original key decision (21/00107) to accept this multi-year consolidated revenue grant allocated to the Council through the Local Government Finance Settlement has been taken .  The officer decision is to accept the grant. This proposed decision is to approve the framework for deployment and delivery of the grant. Multi-year CRF allocation as detailed above and within the funds received via the consolidated revenue grant (Local Government Finance Settlement).

Funding will be managed through existing financial governance frameworks including: Delegated authority for timely spend and alignment with grant conditions

KCC’s confirmed allocation:

Year 1 – 2026/27

£19.2m

Year 2 – 2027/28

£19.2m

Year 3: - 2028/29

£22.1m*

*£22.1m (which includes an estimated £2.8m for the consolidated contribution previously distributed to District Councils for Discretionary Housing Payments DHP)

 

Key changes (to HSF) and clarifications include:

 

·   Monthly payments to local authorities, with first payment due in April 2026, following acceptance of Officer ROD decision no: OD/26/00005

·      Housing Payment element replaces DHP within CRF scope.

·   Cash-first principle for Crisis Payments unless inappropriate (e.g., safeguarding, fraud risk). To ensure robustness to this advice, steps to enable residents to take more personal responsibility to help improve their own financial circumstances will be undertaken. This approach is designed to empower people to take charge of their own situation

·   This cash?first approach is the preferred option of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). However, local authorities have discretion to determine whether cash payments, vouchers, or alternative services are the most appropriate means of meeting an individual’s need.

·   Prohibition on blanket schemes targeted solely at free school meal eligible households; support must be needs-based.

 

Legal Implications

 

The Crisis and Resilience Fund is a ringfenced grant from the Department for Work [“DWP”] and Pensions replacing the Household Support Fund and Discretionary Housing Payments.

Funding must be used strictly in accordance with the scope of the guidance set by Government, and the terms and conditions of the grant. KCC will apply appropriate legal mechanisms as part of issuing or deploying any grant monies to ensure any partners or third parties in receipt of grant funding remain compliant.

-       Acceptance and deployment of CRF will be underpinned by the grant determination issued under Section 31 of the Local Government Act 2003 and associated guidance

-       Contractual arrangements may require procurement activity for voucher platforms or closed loop systems. Third Party Agreements, where funds may be distributed through partners, (e.g charities, voluntary sector) must be specific, legally binding and ensure compliance with the main DWP grant conditions.

-       Implementation requires robust data sharing agreements, particularly if working with third-party partners to distribute funds, ensuring compliance with GDPR

-       Robust, auditable evidence for all decisions on awards is required because KCC is accountable to the DWP.

Equalities implications

 

Projects undertaken using this funding will conduct a full EQIA, and equalities implications will be reviewed as work progresses.

-       An Equality Impact Assessment (EQIA) has been completed for the service. Current evidence suggests there is no negative impact, and this recommendation is an appropriate measure to advance equality and create stability for vulnerable people experiencing financial hardship.

-       Early consideration indicates potential positive impacts for low-income households; any risks will be mitigated through targeted design and accessible routes.

 

Data Protection implications

 

-       A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is in progress, with the initial screening process which will inform the scope of the full assessment. All programme components involving the processing of personal data, including application platforms, data flows, and any data?sharing arrangements with delivery partners will undergo DPIA consideration. Where a full DPIA is required, it will be finalised prior to implementation of the relevant component. All processing activities will be undertaken in accordance with UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, and the Council’s Information Governance and Data Protection policies, with emerging requirements captured through ongoing governance and change?control processes.

-        

 

How does the proposed decision align to the Council’s; Strategic Statement:

 

Reforming Kent

 

CRF is effectively a delivery mechanism for several of the core ambitions in Reforming Kent. The alignment is evident in four main ways.

 

Reforming Kent focuses on helping residents in crisis whilst also delivering innovative cross-cutting projects across teams and organisations to reduce longer-term dependency and demand whilst improving outcomes by encouraging personal responsibility.

Prevention and demand reduction

Reforming Kent emphasises preventing problems before they escalate into high?cost statutory interventions. CRF explicitly aims to reduce crisis escalation, homelessness, and repeat emergency demand by intervening earlier and more holistically through resilience provision.

Targeting inequality and vulnerability

The strategic statement focuses on narrowing inequalities and protecting the most vulnerable. CRF is explicitly needs?based, targeted at low?income households experiencing financial shocks, and designed to improve fair access to support across the county.

Community?based, joined?up delivery

Reforming Kent stresses stronger local partnerships and community resilience. CRF supports  community coordination, referral pathways, hubs, and digital tools that create a more connected local welfare landscape, rather than fragmented crisis responses.

Administering schemes across all of Kent whilst building in the ability to utilise some of the funding for smaller, more bespoke projects tailored to the diverse needs of different localities be they urban, coastal or rural, more deprived or more affluent. This includes providing sensitive budgeting support, such as helping households review and audit discretionary (nonessential) expenditure when money is tight, to ensure essential needs are prioritised without judgement. 

Best value and financial sustainability

The strategic statement prioritises best value and long?term financial sustainability. CRF is framed as supporting this by reducing reliance on high?cost interventions, embedding governance arrangements, and aligning with existing financial oversight models.

How this is being used internally

The link between Reforming Kent and CRF is already being applied in practice:

CRF documentation explicitly references alignment with KCC Business Plan priorities and Corporate Equality Objectives, which sit under the Reforming Kent umbrella.

 

Discussion forums and meetings (for example CRF and CRF District Meeting Catch Ups) are focused on how CRF delivery models support longer?term reform rather than shorter term solutions.

 

Decision Maker: Leader of the Council

Decision due date: Not before 21/04/2026 To allow 28 day notice period required under Executive Decision regulations

Lead officer: Tracy Veasey

Notice of decision: 31/03/2026

Anticipated restriction: Open


24/02/2026 - 26/00012 - Microsoft 365 Licences Enterprise Agreement and Azure Consumption 2026 - 202926/00012 -

Proposed decision

 

The Deputy Leader to agree to:

 

  1. enter into a new Microsoft licencing agreement for 3 years to meet KCC business and Infrastructure licensing requirements – including the Microsoft Azure Consumption; and

 

  1. delegate authority to the Director of Technology, in consultation with the Deputy Leader, for the necessary contractual negotiations and authority to enter into any legal agreements required to implement the above.

 

Reason for the decision

KCC needs to enter into a new licensing agreement to ensure continuation of the use of the Microsoft Office 365 suite and all of the tools available, including security packages. This agreement will also include the Azure consumption.

 

Background

KCC entered into an Enterprise Licencing Agreement with Microsoft via its reseller in June 2023, for a period of three years under Key decision 23/00037. This agreement provides access to a variety of M365 applications, tools and modules which are essential to supporting the Councils business operations.

 

As the current agreement expires on 30 June 2026, when a new licencing agreement is required to ensure business continuity and continued use of the M365 licence estate and all of its benefits.

 

As part of this arrangement the Council will be able to take advantage of enhanced licensing which is critical to support its remote working policy and enhancing the security of KCC’s infrastructure. This will also support the Council’s Cloud First strategy.

 

Options (other options considered but discarded)

·        Do nothing – dismissed, as a licensing agreement is necessary for the day to day running of the Council. Microsoft licencing is standard across the public sector and cannot be purchased directly, but only through a Licencing Solutions Partner.

 

·        Run a procurement to enter into a new Microsoft licencing agreement with a new provider – Microsoft licencing is standard pricing across the public sector. This would involve beginning a relationship with a new partner, whereby our current relationship is well established and trusted.

 

·        Enter into a new Microsoft licencing agreement with existing provider Following a procurement exercise undertaken in 2020, the Council has established a strong working relationship with Bytes Software Services Ltd.This supplier also provides additional support in ensuring our licence and Azure estate is optimised and efficient - this is the recommended option.

 

How the proposed decision supports the Council’s Strategic Statement

The Microsoft environment is a crucial part of the technology infrastructure and as such forms part of building KCC resilience.

 

Decision Maker: Deputy Leader of the Council

Decision due date: Not before 25/03/2026 To allow 28 day notice period required under Executive Decision regulations

Lead officer: Tina Lloyd

Notice of decision: 24/02/2026

Anticipated restriction: Open


24/02/2026 - 26/00009 - Hardelot Centre France

Proposed decision – to cease the delivery of services at the Hardelot Centre in France.

 

Reason for the decision

 

-       Required in response to consideration of where Council resource is prioritised, the financial viability of the services currently delivered and asset condition issues.

 

Background

 

-       The Hardelot Centre is a well-established facility in northern France where a range of services (e.g. accommodation, activities and trips) have been delivered for over 20 years.  It provides accommodation and ancillary facilities alongside a programme of activities for schools and other groups across England and partners on the Straits Committee (France, Belgium and the Netherlands). The revenue budget for the service is -£30k.  In the last three financial years, the service has not delivered a surplus.  The revenue pressure was £25.8k in 2022/23, £8.8k in 2023/24 and £45k in 2024/25.

 

Options (other options considered but discarded)

 

-       Option one – do nothing.

 

-       Option two – undertake the necessary works and develop a viable service model to support the long-term delivery of services.

 

-       Option three – cease the services (proposal recommended for progression)

 

How the proposed decision supports the Council’s Strategic Statement

 

Alignment with Aim 2: ‘Reforming Kent County Council’ and its supporting objectives

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Economic Development and Special Projects

Decision due date: Not before 25/03/2026 To allow 28 day notice period required under Executive Decision regulations

Lead officer: Tom Marchant

Notice of decision: 24/02/2026

Anticipated restriction: Open


21/10/2025 - 25/00087 - Proposal to permanently increase the formal designated number of Broomhill Bank School, Broomhill Road, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, TN3 0TB, from 318 students to 490 students

Proposed decision –The Cabinet Member for Education and Skills:

 

  1. APPROVE the increase of Broomhill Bank School’s designated number from 318 students to 490 students

 

  1. AGREE to allocate the funding from the Children Young People and Education Services High Needs Capital Budget that will be required to complete the expansion

 

  1. AGREE to issue a Public Notice to permanently increase Broomhill Bank School’s formal designated numbers following a representation period of four weeks with no substantive objections received, implement the decision

 

  1. DELEGATE authority to the Director of Infrastructure, in consultation with the Head of Law and Director of Education to enter into any necessary contracts or other legal agreements as required to implement the decision; and

 

  1. AGREE for the Director of Infrastructure, to be the nominated Authority Representative within the relevant agreements and to enter into variations as envisaged under the contracts.

 

Reason for the decision

 

Kent County Council (KCC) as the Local Authority, has a statutory duty to ensure sufficient high quality school places are available, in the right places for all learners, while at the same time fulfilling our other responsibilities to raise education standards and promote parental preference. The Kent Commissioning Plan 2025-2029 indicated that there will be a shortfall in Special School provision in North and West Kent. Even though KCC’s direction of travel is to increase Special Educational Needs (SEN) provision in mainstream schools and associated Specialist Resource Provisions (SRPs), due to already identified shortfalls and anticipated population growth in certain areas of North and West Kent, more specialist provision is required for children and young people with more complex needs.

 

KCC SEN Data for North Kent as at April 2025, evidenced that there were 237 children and young people waiting for a Special School placement, and 243 open cases, of which was anticipated that a large number would require a Special School placement. For West Kent as at April 2025, there were 201 children and young people awaiting a Special School placement, with 207 open cases.

 

In July 2023 KCC was informed that it had been successful in bidding for a new 250 place Profound, Severe, and Complex Needs (PSCN) Special School in North Kent (Swanley). The school had an initial target opening date of September 2026 and was to be funded and built by the Department for Education (DfE). However, for a number of reasons progress has been incredibly slow and there are now concerns that the school may not progress any further. Even if it were to continue, that school would not be built until 2028 at the very earliest and as the data shows, provision is required now. KCC Officers and the Cabinet Member for Education and Skills continue to push the DfE and Ministers for confirmation of the status of the proposed new Swanley Special School.

 

The proposal to permanently increase the formal designated number of the Broomhill Bank School from 318 students to 490 students, will require new teaching spaces and enhancements to existing infrastructure on both school sites in Tunbridge Wells and Hextable.

 

If no further action is taken in the longer term, KCC will find it extremely difficult to provide sufficient state-funded Special School provision in North and West Kent.

 

Background – Provide brief additional context

 

Broomhill Bank School is a Foundation Special School and a member of Kent Special Educational Needs Trust (KsENT), catering for students aged 11-19 years who have communication and interaction needs associated with Autism and speech, language, and communication needs. All students have Education, Health, and Care Plans. Following an inspection that took place in October 2023, Ofsted deemed Broomhill Bank School to be a ‘GOOD’ school.

 

Due to delays regarding the proposed new PSCN School, the numbers of students in North Kent still requiring specialist provision at this time, and the fact that all Special Schools in the locality are already over capacity; this is unsustainable in the short and medium term, and if not addressed will lead to further places in the independent sector. There is a clear need for further expansion of state-funded specialist provision, where appropriate, to secure the current number of places on a permanent basis alongside the expansion of SRPs and mainstream inclusion.

 

Options (other options considered but discarded)

 

KCC has considered whether other Special Schools in the North and West Kent areas are viable candidates for a permanent increase to their formal designated numbers. There is also a proposal to expand Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy, but this alone will not produce sufficient places to meet current demand, as that expansion primarily relates to additional places for Primary age children. Therefore, Broomhill Bank School is the most appropriate and viable option to also increase its designated number.

 

By increasing their formal designated number through the physical expansion of Broomhill Bank School, which is KCC maintained provision, it protects the Local Authority from increased revenue costs. The proposal will help to mitigate against the need to place students further away from home and incurring additional transport costs, alongside incurring increased costs from placing a greater number of children in high-cost independent settings to alleviate the current pressures in KCC state-funded Special Schools in the area.

 

How the proposed decision supports the Framing Kent's Future - Our Council Strategy 2022-2026

 

The 'Securing Kent's Future' strategy outlines the measures that KCC intend to take to ensure that Kent remains financially stable, now, and long into the future. It describes the statutory priorities.

 

This proposed decision supports Priority 1 of Framing Kent’s Future-Our Council Strategy 2022-2026:

·         Priority 1: Levelling Up Kent – It will help maintain KCC’s strategic role in supporting schools in Kent to deliver accessible, high quality education provision for all families.

 

How the proposed decision supports Securing Kent’s Future 2022-2026: Securing Kents Future - Budget Recovery Strategy.pdf

 

This proposed decision is compliant with Objective 1 of Securing Kent’s Future, KCC as the LA proposes to expand Broomhill Bank School.This proposal is necessary for KCC to continue to deliver the statutory duty, in a cost-effective way, in line with the guidelines described in the Securing Kent's Future 2022-2026 strategy.

 

The proposed new Strategic Statement will be presented to Full Council on 6 November 2025 and considered for adoption. As this FED was drafted prior to that date, it aligns with the relevant policies at the time. Even though the Cabinet Committee Paper will be published after 6 November 2025 Full Council meeting, it will have been drafted prior to the adoption of a new Strategic Statement and so will also refer to Securing Kent’s Future 2022-2026.

 

Financial Implications

 

Progression of the scheme will be dependent on the outcome of detailed feasibility and design work – these will inform the full overall cost of the scheme, at which point the formal decision will be taken by the Cabinet Member for Education and Skills. The project will be a school managed scheme and will be confirmed via legally binding funding and development agreements between KCC and Broomhill Bank School. The costs of the two new blocks on the North (Hextable) site, and upgrades and modifications across both the North (Hextable) site and West (Tunbridge Well) site will be borne by the CYPE High Needs Capital Budget. This is funded from a ring-fenced Capital Grant from the DfE. From initial feasibility studies, the estimated cost for the whole scheme was £4,000,000.

 

However, after initial feedback from KCC Planning and Highways colleagues, there is a possibility that costs may increase, primarily due to the need for additional Highways mitigations around the Broomhill Bank School North (Hextable) site. Therefore, we will not be requesting the formal decision to be taken until such time that planning is concluded, and the full extent of the cost of the scheme is known.The latest estimates indicate the costs could increase to as much as c£5.5m, but much work still needs to be undertaken with Planners and Highways to determine the extent of the mitigations required.

 

For Special School capital projects, the average cost per student place for a school expansion in Kent is c£85,000. However, even if this scheme were to produce only the teaching accommodation for 105 students the higher estimated cost equates to a cost per place of c£52,000, which still demonstrates good value for money.

 

KCC Project Managers will be undertaking continuous checks to keep project costs as low as possible.

 

An allowance of up to £2,500 per teaching space may be payable to Broomhill Bank School; to outfit each new teaching room with appropriate ICT equipment, such as touch screens or projection equipment. This will be met from the overall Capital allocation for this scheme.

 

The High Needs Capital Programme has been running since 2020-21 with a total combined budget of just under £109m of which £67m has been either spent or committed to current known schemes (as at Quarter 1 2025 capital monitoring reported to Cabinet in September 2025). In the same way as the Basic Need programme is managed, to ensure all schemes are prioritised appropriately and expenditure is controlled within available funding, any proposed new or additional capital expenditure, first needs to be considered by KCC Officers through Education Asset Board, before being progressed through the formal governance processes and included in the capital programme.

 

Should the scheme not proceed through to completion, any costs incurred at the time of cessation would become abortive costs and are likely to be recharged to Revenue. This would be reported through the regular financial monitoring reports to Cabinet. This would be a cost to the General Fund.

 

As the scheme progresses, £8,000 per newly provided learning space, would be provided towards the cost of furniture and equipment, such as tables, desks, chairs, cabinets and learning resources. This would be funded from the Dedicated Schools Grant Growth Fund.

 

State funded Special School places are commissioned by Local Authorities and paid based on a rate per place. The rate per place set by KCC for Broomhill Bank School is currently between £15,041 to £24,946 dependant on need type. The higher rate for Broomhill Bank School is approximately £35,000 less than a place in an independent Special School. Local Authorities use the High Needs Block of the Dedicated Schools Grant to pay for these places. Broomhill Bank School will use the revenue income they receive to facilitate additional staffing requirements and increased running costs.

 

Legal Implications

 

Under the Children and Families Act 2014 KCC has a duty ‘to support the child and his or her parent, or the young person, in order to facilitate the development of the child or young person and to help him or her achieve the best possible educational and other outcomes’. By ensuring we have appropriate provision as locally as possible, we are delivering on our obligation in accordance with this legislation.

 

Local Authorities need to deliver their statutory duties and be aware of non-statutory guidance and advice, which relate to children and young people with SEN. These are:

·       Department for Education-Making significant changes to maintained schools 2025: statutory guidance for proposers and decision makers.

·       The Equalities Act which: places duties on Local Authorities to review support services and in doing so requires Local Authorities to have due regard to the way in which any changes will affect children and young people with a disability.

·       The SEND Code of Practice places requirements on Local Authorities to: provide access to advice from a suitably qualified person as part of the EHCP process and subsequent “assess, plan, do, review” cycles, and make appropriate provision for those with an EHC plan in the 0-25 range.

·       Sufficiency Duties: KCC is under a statutory duty to contribute towards the spiritual, moral, mental, and physical development of the community by securing that efficient primary education and secondary education are available to meet the needs of the population of their area: section 13 of the Education Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”).

·       KCC must ensure that its education functions are exercised by the authority with a view to promoting high standards, ensuring fair access to opportunity for education and training, and promoting the fulfilment of learning potential by every person under the age of 20 and those over the age of 20 and for whom an EHC Plan is maintained: section 13A. By section 14, KCC must secure that sufficient schools for providing primary and secondary education are available for their area, defined as being sufficient in number, character and equipment to provide for all students the opportunity of appropriate education.

·       Under section 27 of the Children and Families Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”), KCC is under a duty to keep under review the educational provision, training provision and social care provision made in its area (and outside it) for children and young people who have special educational needs or a disability. KCC must consider the extent to which its provision is sufficient to meet the educational needs, training needs and social care needs of the children and young people concerned.

·         KCC, when carrying out its functions must have “due regard” to the provisions of section 149 of the Equality Act 2010, known as the ‘public sector equality duty’.

 

All individual proposals to either establish new, expand current or cease current provision are required to go through the statutory process under The School Organisation (Prescribed Alterations to Maintained Schools) (England) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025. As part of this process, a public consultation was undertaken ahead of presentation of the proposal to CYPE Cabinet Committee. Should the Cabinet Member for Education and Skills agree to the permanently increase to the formal designated number of the Broomhill Bank School from 318 students to 490 students, through a permanent expansion, a Public Notice will be issued for a period of 4 weeks.

 

The Director of Infrastructure in consultation with the Director of Education will be overseeing the scheme to ensure public funds are utilised appropriately.

 

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Education and Skills

Decision due date: Not before 19/11/2025 To allow 28 day notice period required under Executive Decision regulations

Lead officer: Ian Watts

Notice of decision: 21/10/2025

Anticipated restriction: Open


21/10/2025 - 25/00086 - Proposal to facilitate the expansion of Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy, Beechenlea Lane, Swanley, Kent, BR8 8DR

Proposed decision –The Cabinet Member for Education and Skills:

 

  1. APPROVE the requisite funding from the Children Young People and Education High Needs Capital Programme that will be required to increase Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy’s designated number from 120 to 192 students

 

  1. DELEGATE authority to the Director of Infrastructure, in consultation with the Head of Law and Director of Education to enter into any necessary contracts or other legal agreements as required to implement the decision; and

 

  1. AGREE for the Director of Infrastructure, to be the nominated Authority Representative within the relevant agreements and to enter into variations as envisaged under the contracts.

 

Reason for the decision

 

Kent County Council (KCC) as a Local Authority, has a statutory duty to ensure sufficient high quality school places are available, in the right places for all learners, while at the same time fulfilling our other responsibilities to raise education standards and promote parental preference. The Kent Commissioning Plan 2025-2029 indicated that there will be a shortfall in Special School provision in North Kent. Even though KCC’s direction of travel is to increase Special Educational Needs (SEN) provision in mainstream schools and associated Specialist Resource Provisions (SRPs), due to already identified shortfalls and anticipated population growth in certain areas of North Kent, more specialist provision is required for children and young people with more complex needs.

 

KCC SEN Data for North Kent as at April 2025, evidenced that there were 237 children and young people waiting for a Special School placement, and 243 open cases, of which was anticipated that a large number would require a Special School placement.

 

In July 2023 KCC was informed that it had been successful in bidding for a new 250 place Profound, Severe, and Complex Needs (PSCN) Special School in North Kent (Swanley). The school had an initial target opening date of September 2026 and was to be funded and built by the Department for Education (DfE). However, for a number of reasons progress has been incredibly slow and there are now concerns that the school may not progress any further. Even if it were to continue, that school would not be built until 2028 at the very earliest and as the data shows, provision is required now. KCC Officers and the Cabinet Member for Education and Skills continue to push the DfE and Ministers for confirmation of the status of the proposed new Swanley Special School.

 

The proposal to facilitate the expansion of Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy will create 48 places of additional primary provision (Reception to Year 6) plus additional places for secondary aged pupils. The building project for this expansion will be managed by Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy, while KCC Infrastructure will oversee the scheme from a quality assurance perspective.

 

If no further action is taken in the longer term, KCC will find it extremely difficult to provide sufficient state-funded Special School provision in North Kent.

 

Background – Provide brief additional context

 

Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy is a Single Academy Trust and officially sits under the

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) but is located in Swanley Kent. KCC is the

main placing authority with the school. Parkwood HallCo-operative Academy is a Special

School for children and people aged 8-19 (Year 4 to Year 14) who have moderate to severe

learning difficulties and Autism. Many of the students have additional needs including ADHD,

Downs Syndrome and language difficulties. All students have Education, Health and Care

Plans. Following an inspection that took place in July 2025, Ofsted deemed Parkwood Hall Co-

operative Academy to be a ‘GOOD’ in 4 out of the 5 areas, and ‘OUTSTANDING’ in the area of

Behaviours an Attitudes.

 

The Principal of Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy is already admitting students over and

above the designated number. Currently the number of students on roll is 135. Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy continues to admit students with more complex needs, whilst ensuring the quality of education for all students is maintained.

 

Due to the school’s location RBKC now has limited interaction with the school and places a

very limited number of children and young people there. KCC continues to be one of the main

placing authorities with Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy, placing 61 students out of a total school roll of 136 for the 2024/2025 academic year. For the start of this current academic year, 2025/2026, the school has 65 students placed by Kent out of a total school roll of 135 with no students placed from RBKC.

                       

KCC has formed strong working relationships with the Senior Leadership of Parkwood Hall Co-

operative Academy, and the school has indicated its very clear desire to be recognised as part

of the Special Educational Needs (SEN) system in Kent. Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy

has acknowledged the need for more specialist placements for children with complex needs

predominantly across the primary age groups, and has therefore proposed to expand its age

range from what is currently 8- to 19-year-olds (Year 4 to Year 14) to 4-to-19-year olds

(Reception to Year 14) to support need in the North Kent area.

 

North Kent is still encountering significant growth primarily in Dartford, but the other two districts

of Gravesham and Sevenoaks are fast approaching completion of their new Local Plans, which

will see significant housebuilding required for the period up to 2040 and beyond.

 

Due to delays regarding the proposed new PSCN School, the numbers of students in North

Kent still requiring specialist provision at this time, and the fact that all Special Schools in the

locality are already over capacity, there is a clear need for further expansion of state-funded

specialist provision to ensure the current number of places can be maintained on a permanent

basis.             

 

This proposal is part of a plan to help alleviate current pressures and help mitigate future

population growth across the wider North Kent area, alongside the expansion of SRPs and

mainstream inclusion.

 

Options (other options considered but discarded)

 

KCC has considered whether other Special Schools in the North Kent area are viable candidates for a permanent increase to their formal designated numbers. There is also a proposal to expand Broomhill Bank School, but this alone will not produce sufficient places to meet current demand, as that expansion primarily relates to additional places for secondary age children. Therefore, Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy is the most appropriate and viable option to also increase its designated number. It is however, recognised there is no guarantee these places will be offered to Kent children, and we have no statutory intervention powers to secure these placements. Although this has been considered an acceptable risk.

        

By increasing their formal designated number through the physical expansion of Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy, which is a state-funded provision, it protects the Local Authority from increased revenue costs. The proposal will help to mitigate against the need to place students further away from home and incurring additional transport costs, alongside incurring increased costs from placing a greater number of children in high-cost independent settings to alleviate the current pressures in KCC state-funded Special Schools in the area.

 

How the proposed decision supports the Framing Kent's Future - Our Council Strategy 2022-2026

 

The 'Securing Kent's Future' strategy outlines the measures that KCC intend to take to ensure that Kent remains financially stable, now, and long into the future. It describes the statutory priorities.

 

This proposed decision supports Priority 1 of Framing Kent’s Future-Our Council Strategy 2022-2026:

·         Priority 1: Levelling Up Kent – It will help maintain KCC’s strategic role in supporting schools in Kent to deliver accessible, high quality education provision for all families.

 

How the proposed decision supports Securing Kent’s Future 2022-2026: Securing Kents Future - Budget Recovery Strategy.pdf

 

This proposed decision is compliant with Objective 1 of Securing Kent’s Future, KCC as the LA proposes to expand Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy.This proposal is necessary for KCC to continue to deliver the statutory duty, in a cost-effective way, in line with the guidelines described in the Securing Kent's Future 2022-2026 strategy.

 

The proposed new Strategic Statement will be presented to Full Council on 6 November 2025 and considered for adoption. As this FED was drafted prior to that date, it aligns with the relevant policies at the time. Even though the Cabinet Committee Paper will be published after 6 November 2025 Full Council meeting, it will have been drafted prior to the adoption of a new Strategic Statement and so will also refer to Securing Kent’s Future 2022-2026.

 

Financial Implications

 

Progression of the scheme will be dependent on the outcome of detailed feasibility and design work – these will inform the full overall cost of the scheme, at which point the formal decision will be taken by the Cabinet Member for Education and Skills. The project will be a school managed scheme and will be confirmed via legally binding funding and development agreements between KCC and Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy.

 

The cost of the works will be borne by the CYPE High Needs Capital Budget; this is funded from a ring-fenced Capital Grant from the DfE. From initial feasibility studies, the estimated cost for the whole scheme was £1,500,000. However, after initial feedback from KCC Infrastructure colleagues, there is a possibility that costs may increase, primarily due to the possible need for additional Highways mitigations around the Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy site and other requirements on the refurbishments of existing buildings. Therefore, we will not be requesting the formal decision to be taken until such time that planning is concluded, and the full extent of the cost of the scheme is known. The latest estimates indicate the costs could increase to as much as c£3,000,000, but much work still needs to be undertaken with Planners and Highways to determine the extent of any mitigations that may be required. 

 

For Special School capital projects, the average cost per student place for a school expansion in Kent is c£85,000. However, the higher estimated cost for this scheme equates to a cost per place of only c£42,000, which demonstrates good value for money.            KCC Project Managers will be undertaking continuous checks to keep build project costs as low as possible.

 

An allowance of up to £2,500 may be payable to Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy to outfit each new teaching room with appropriate ICT equipment, such as touch screens or projection equipment. This will be met from the overall Capital allocation for this scheme.

 

The High Needs Capital Programme has been running since 2020-21 with a total combined budget of just under £109m of which £67m has been either spent or committed to current known schemes (as at Quarter 1 2025 capital monitoring reported to Cabinet in September 2025).In the same way as the Basic Need programme is managed, to ensure all schemes are prioritised appropriately and expenditure is controlled within available funding, any proposed new or additional capital expenditure, first needs to be considered by KCC Officers through Education Asset Board, before being progressed through the formal governance processes and included in the capital programme.

 

Should the scheme not proceed through to completion, any costs incurred at the time of cessation would become abortive costs and are likely to be recharged to Revenue. This would be reported through the regular financial monitoring reports to Cabinet. This would be a cost to the General Fund.

 

State funded Special School places are commissioned by Local Authorities and paid based on a rate per place. The rate per place for Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy is currently between £30,430 to £31,400 dependent on the Key Stage. The higher rate forParkwood Hall Co-operative Academy is approximately c£30,000 less than a place in an independent Special School. Local Authorities use the High Needs Block of the Dedicated Schools Grant to pay for these places. Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy will use the revenue income they receive to facilitate additional staffing requirements and increased running costs.

 

Legal Implications

 

Under the Children and Families Act 2014 KCC has a duty ‘to support the child and his or her parent, or the young person, in order to facilitate the development of the child or young person and to help him or her achieve the best possible educational and other outcomes’. By ensuring we have appropriate provision as locally as possible, we are delivering on our obligation in accordance with this legislation.

 

Local Authorities need to deliver their statutory duties and be aware of non-statutory guidance and advice, which relate to children and young people with SEN. These are:

·       Department for Education-Making significant changes to an academy 2025: non-statutory guidance on collaborative school place planning and making organisational changes to academies.

·       The Equalities Act which:  places duties on Local Authorities to review support services and in doing so requires Local Authorities to have due regard to the way in which any changes will affect children and young people with a disability.

·       The SEND Code of Practice places requirements on Local Authorities to: provide access to advice from a suitably qualified person as part of the EHCP process and subsequent “assess, plan, do, review” cycles, and make appropriate provision for those with an EHC plan in the 0-25 range.

·       Sufficiency Duties: KCC is under a statutory duty to contribute towards the spiritual, moral, mental, and physical development of the community by securing that efficient primary education and secondary education are available to meet the needs of the population of their area: section 13 of the Education Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”).

·       KCC must ensure that its education functions are exercised by the authority with a view to promoting high standards, ensuring fair access to opportunity for education and training, and promoting the fulfilment of learning potential by every person under the age of 20 and those over the age of 20 and for whom an EHC Plan is maintained: section 13A. By section 14, KCC must secure that sufficient schools for providing primary and secondary education are available for their area, defined as being sufficient in number, character and equipment to provide for all students the opportunity of appropriate education.

·       Under section 27 of the Children and Families Act 2014 (“the 2014 Act”), KCC is under a duty to keep under review the educational provision, training provision and social care provision made in its area (and outside it) for children and young people who have special educational needs or a disability. KCC must consider the extent to which its provision is sufficient to meet the educational needs, training needs and social care needs of the children and young people concerned.

·       KCC, when carrying out its functions must have “due regard” to the provisions of section 149 of the Equality Act 2010, known as the ‘public sector equality duty’.

 

Planning permission will be required for the new accommodation to enable the expansion of the school’s accommodation. As part of the Funding Agreement, Parkwood Hall Co-operative Academy will be responsible for gaining the appropriate planning consent.

 

All individual proposals to either establish new, expand current or cease current provision will be required to go through the DfE process of making significant changes to an academy (non-statutory guidance on collaborative school place planning and making organisational changes to academies, August 2025).

 

The Director of Infrastructure in consultation with the Director of Education will be overseeing the scheme to ensure public funds are utilised appropriately.

 

Decision Maker: Cabinet Member for Education and Skills

Decision due date: Not before 19/11/2025 To allow 28 day notice period required under Executive Decision regulations

Lead officer: Ian Watts

Notice of decision: 21/10/2025

Anticipated restriction: Open