Alison Petters,
Risk and Delivery Assurance Manager,
was in attendance for this
item.
- Alison
Petters introduced the report. An overview of the report was
provided and the notable changes since last year were
highlighted.
- In
response to comments and questions, it was said.
- It was
asked how much was being spent on external
consultants and when would their reports be
available. Richard Smith said that specialist support for some
pieces of work was required and delivered value for
money. The cost of the consultants would be circulated outside
the meeting.
- A
Member expressed concern that the Council was not actively engaging
with providers which was required to help mitigate risks.
Richard Smith said that they were aware of the challenges
that providers were facing. It was said that
engagement was occurring on a regular basis and fee
uplifts could only be provided in line with what had been
budgeted.
- It was
asked what the Council's provider of last resort was if the
risk of provider failure or market sustainability failure was
realised. Richard Smith said that it was difficult to give an
answer for the whole of Kent as different areas had different
needs and challenges. The local authority would be the provider of
last resort. Mark Albiston said that work was ongoing examining the
quality of the market and how resources can be realigned to
provide support while working alongside the regulator.
- A
Member asked if each individual risk could be
aggregated into a top-line risk. Alison Petters said that the
Corporate Risk Register was an aggregation of all
the risks held across the whole organisation. Richard
Smith said that Adult Social Care would continue to be a
high-risk environment for the foreseeable future. Mark
Albiston said that they would look to provide clarity on
which areas of Kent faced higher risk.
- It was
asked how the risks were being controlled now and how
much was based on future implementation of strategies. Richard
Smith reassured Members that work was constantly ongoing on
managing risk and looking into mitigations. Mark Albiston
said that the team prioritised work based on the level of risk on
an ongoing basis.
- A
concern was expressed that decisions being taken by
the Council, and some of the savings outlined in
the budget, were aggravating the risks and if an
analysis of this had been undertaken. It was also asked how
this would be monitored going forward. Richard Smith
noted that judgements based on risk were being
taken daily and that taking resources out of adult social care
was a risk but required for the sustainability of the Council. Mr
Watkins said that difficult decisions had to be made and
that the risks did inform the decision-making process.
- Richard Smith said that the Adult Social Care budget would be in
the public domain soon and would check when this becomes
available. It was noted that the £12 million
received from the central Government would be split equally between
adults and children’s social care. £1.5 million was
earmarked for transformation and the rest to rebase the
budget.
- Asked
about workforce recruitment and retention and if the Council could
make better use of the assets at its disposal. Sydney Hill said
that a national recruitment campaign would start soon focussed on
recruiting social workers and occupational
therapists and there was also ongoing work to highlight
the benefits of living in Kent, growing the workforce through links
with universities in Kent, supporting newly qualified social
workers and increasing the apprenticeship offer from every three
years to annually. Mark Albiston said there were some clear and
immediate workforce challenges which impacted on the ability to
deliver all statutory services. It was said that
market premiums in other areas, not just London were
contributing to a large pay gap. The areas with
the biggest challenges had been identified and would
be targeted with eh support of external
companies.
- Richard Smith said that both the ICB and local authorities were
under financial pressure but were working on creating a joined-up
financial arrangement and a joint out-of-hospital service between
community trust and local authority staff. Need to shift
the conversation on hospital discharge from discharge to
prevention. (REVIEW)
- RESOLVED the Adult Social Care Cabinet Committee considered and
commented on the risks presented.