Issue - meetings

Item from Ms Carey

Following Cabinet’s agreement to proposals set out in a report on 19 March 2012 Mr Sweetland took a decision on 3 April 2012 to agree changes to both the operating policy and the network infrastructure of the Household Waste Recycling Centres provided by Kent County Council, this included the closure of the Hawkinge household waste recycling centre. 

Ms Carey has indicated that she wishes to raise the following points:

1. Out of date figures were being used;

2. Hawkinge is the only site not open at weekends;

3. No statistical information was available as to the number of users;

4. The figures quoted by way of savings appear to include costs which would be transferred to alternative sites upon closure; and

5. The public questionnaire was biased in the way Hawkinge was referred to.

(1)     Ms Carey introduced the item explaining that she was the local member for Elham Valley where the Hawkinge Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC) was located.  Ms Carey accepted that savings had to be made by the County Council and that the Hawkinge HWRC may have to be closed but Hawkinge Town Council and Swingfield Parish Council had asked that this issue be discussed by the Scrutiny Committee.

(2)     Ms Carey addressed the points contained within the agenda papers.

Point 5 - the Town and Parish Council had concerns over the questions within the consultation document in that they were leading and in some cases did not sufficiently explain the background. 

Point 4 - The Town and Parish Council had struggled to understand how the savings would be made. 

Point 3 – Hawkinge HWRC was an older site so data regarding the number of people using the centre had not been recorded and therefore the information available was not comparable with Kent’s other HWRCs.  Point 2 – the present Town Council would be happy to see extended hours at Hawkinge HWRC. 

Point 1 – the Town and Parish Councils were of the opinion that the figures being used were out of date.  It was considered that the closure of Hawkinge HWRC had undermined the efforts of the local people to achieve high recycling rates.     

(3)     In response to a question, Ms Carey stated that Hawkinge HWRC was open on Saturday mornings but suggested that more people would use the site if it was open all weekend in line with many other HWRCs.

(4)     Mr Sweetland explained that the consultation had been Kent wide in line with the Kent wide review.  The response to the consultation was around 45% and had been one of the highest Kent County Council had received.  The review had been thorough, there had been updates to the Policy Overview and Scrutiny Committee meetings, and an Informal Member Group had been set up which had visited most of the HWRCs in Kent.  There had been a public meeting in Hawkinge attended by an officer from KCC and a separate meeting with the Town Council in February. 

(5)     Regarding the wording of the consultation questions Mr Sweetland accepted that there had been some confusion in relation to Ashford; however the questions were factually correct.  A Member asked whether the consultation documents went through a screening process to ensure they conformed to best practice, the Committee suggested that the Policy and Resources Cabinet Committee be asked to investigate whether the consultation process used by KCC was in accordance with best practice. 

(6)     Hawkinge HWRC was due to close at the end of the existing contractual period at the end of summer 2013.  In response to a question about whether Hawkinge Town Council might be able to take over and run the centre themselves there was an opportunity for the Town Council to challenge the right to provide under the Localism Act 2011.  A Member asked for  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6