Agenda and minutes

Cabinet - Monday, 18th July, 2016 10.00 am

Venue: Darent Room, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone. View directions

Contact: Louise Whitaker  Tel: (01622) 694433, Email: louise.whitaker@kent.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

176.

Apologies and Substitutions

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Apologies were received from:

 

Mr Gary Cooke, Cabinet member for Corporate and Democratic Services.

 

Patrick Leeson, Corporate Director for Education and Young People’s Services, who was substituted by Gillian Cawley

177.

Declarations of Interest

Additional documents:

Minutes:

No declarations of interest were received.

178.

Minutes of the Meeting held on 27 June 2016 pdf icon PDF 128 KB

To agree the minutes of the previous meeting as a correct record.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the previous meeting held on 27 June 2016 were agreed as an accurate record subject to the following amendment;

 

Mr Dance, Cabinet member for Economic Development was incorrectly recorded as being in attendance; Mr Holden had attended as his substitute.

 

The amendment having been noted the chairman signed the minutes.

179.

2016-17 Revenue and Capital Budget Monitoring pdf icon PDF 181 KB

To receive the initial forecast revenue and capital budget monitoring position for 2016-17.

 

 

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cabinet received the first budget monitoring report for 2016-17.

 

The report reflected the position for each of the Directorates based on the major issues arising from the 2015-16 outturn and presented to Cabinet on 27 June.

 

The issues had not been addressed in the 2016-17 budget build either  because they came to light after the budget had been agreed or the demand levels on which the budget had been based had increased since the calculations were made.

 

Andy Wood, Corporate Director of Finance and Procurement spoke to the item:

 

      i.        He confirmed in response to comments from the Leader that reporting in the future would be streamlined but that key activity data would continue to be reported.  It was intended that the new style of reporting would achieve the following aims:

·         That the time taken to produce quarterly reports to cabinet would be reduced from approximately 70 days to approximately 35-40 days from the end of the relevant period allowing a more responsive approach to budget management.

·         That resources required to prepare and  produce the reports would be reduced

·         That members would be able to more easily identify the key issues for consideration

    ii.        That the first report in the new format would be received by Cabinet in September.

 

Mr John Simmonds, Cabinet Member for Finance and Procurement introduced the item for members; in particular he referred to the following:

 

      i.        That it was essential to the 2017-18 budget that a balanced, or slightly underspent, 2016-17 budget was delivered.  Therefore he was disappointed to report a £7.9million overspend for the first month. He urged members not to be complacent; he acknowledged that at this time last year the 2015-16 budget was showing an overspend but argued that having already made approximately £0.5billion of savings in recent years delivery of balanced budgets, and identification and realisation of savings had become more difficult.

    ii.        Paragraph 1.4 of the report addressed reporting issues within Directorates, and identified ways in which reporting could help to make forecasting simpler and more accurate.

   iii.        That Specialist Children’s Services continued to experience severe pressures currently reported at £4.5million.  These areas of forecast overspend related largely to the full year effect of increased activity and expenditure experienced in the last half of 2015-16 on residential and fostering and continued pressure on the staffing budgets based on continuing difficulties in recruiting permanent staff. In addition the adoption/permanency budget (principally special guardianship orders) was also experiencing pressure.  Philip Segurola, Director, Specialist Children's Services Social Care, Health and Wellbeing and Peter Oakford, Cabinet Member for Specialist Children’s Services had been invited to attend the Budget Programme Board to further consider how these pressures may be mitigated.

   iv.        Pressures also remained in the following areas:

a.    Unaccompanied asylum seeking children’s budget

b.    Adults Social Care and Health - Learning Disabilities and Mental Health budgets

c.    Growth, Environment and Transport – Young Persons Travel Pass and Waste budgets

    v.        That the Capital Budget was on track with no significant variations to be  ...  view the full minutes text for item 179.

180.

Local Growth Fund Round 3 and Large Local Major Schemes pdf icon PDF 83 KB

To seek endorsement of the Local Growth Fund Round 3 (LGF3) and Large Local Major Scheme (LLMS) bid submissions to Government proposed by the Kent & Medway Economic Partnership & the South East Local Enterprise Partnership.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Cabinet received a report detailing the launch by Government of two new calls for project proposals that would help to unlock economic growth in local areas.

 

Sarah Nurden, Strategic programme Manager (KMEP) introduced the item for members.  In particular she referred to the following:

 

  1. That there were currently two significant funding opportunities available to the Council:

 

  1. In the first call, Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) were

invited to bid for a share of the third tranche of Local Growth Funding (LGF), worth £1.8 billion across England.

 

  1. In the second call, LEPs were invited to bid for a share of the Large Local Major Schemes funding, worth £475m across England.

 

  1. Ms Nurden addressed the LGF fund opportunity and reported that:

 

  1. The Kent and Medway Economic Partnership (KMEP) had met on 14 June and prioritised 34 business cases that had been put forward for consideration. The prioritisation exercise had taken account of various considerations including, value for money, deliverability, total match funding, and the wishes of stakeholders at sub-county level.

 

  1. 21 schemes were selected to be submitted to Government via SELEP.  Of those 21 schemes one had later withdrawn; East Kent Spatial Development

 

  1. The submission must be made via SELEP as Government had been clear that submissions from each of the federated areas would not be accepted.

 

  1. Ms Nurden then turned to the second opportunity, the Large Local Major Scheme (LLMS) and reported the following:

 

  1. That there was £475million available nationally and that SELEP had been invited to submit a web tag compliant scheme worth 75m.  A web-tag compliant bid was one which met the requirements of the Department for Transport and would be extremely resource intensive to produce.  However, an option to bid for development funding in order to produce such a bid was available.

 

  1. The matter was discussed at the recent KMEP meeting and it was agreed to seek improvements to Junction 7 on the M2, known locally as Brenley Corner.  Ms Nurden explained that Junction 7 of the M2 was located on the strategic European transport route of the A2/M2 that ran from the Port of Dover through to the Midlands and the North of England, via the Dartford Crossing but that the current configuration of the junction regularly created peak hour congestion as traffic on the strategic Highways England road network mixed with traffic on the local road network.  Improvement works to this junction were deemed critical to supporting any new Lower Thames Crossing.

 

  1. Ms Nurden continued; she explained that the purpose of the consideration of both matters by Cabinet was to seek endorsement of the list of bids, confirm that KCC would be willing to act as the accountable body for schemes within its geographical boundaries and that delegation of authority to the Council’s S.151 officer to write a letter of support for the bids and draw down funding should they be successful was supported.

 

The Leader thanked Ms Nurden for her introduction and her hard work in difficult circumstances.  He expressed disappointment that the federated nature of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 180.