Agenda and minutes

(1)       The report by the Leader and the Director of Law and Governance on options for new governance arrangements for the County Council was circulated at the meeting.   The Chairman declared consideration of the report to be Urgent as the County Council was due to consider the matter at its meeting on 15 December 2011. 

(2)       The Committee noted that the report on this matter to the County Council would be by the Leader and that the role of the Committee was therefore to make comments which he could incorporate if he was minded to do so.

(3)       Members of the Committee made the following comments in relation to the text of the report:-

            (a)       Para 3 (1): As the appointment of the Cabinet Committee Chairmen would be in the gift of the Leader, what mechanism would be used to appoint a Chairman from the Opposition Groups? 

            (b)       Para 3 (1):  The report did not need to specify that Chairmen could be appointed from Opposition Groups as this was already implied by the phrase “non-executive Members.”

            (c)        Para 3:  The reasons for having a mixed economy of Cabinet Committee Chairmen were noted.  However, if any one particular arrangement was seen to be working better than others, the County Council should not feel tied to the specified 12 month review period. 

            (d)       Para 3:   There might well be a need to trial different chairmanship models for individual Cabinet Committees.

            (e)       Para 3 (6):      It would be essential to retain the Children’s Services Improvement Panel together with the Corporate Parenting Panel.

            (f)         Para 3 (15) & (16):    The text in these two paragraphs on proportionality were capable of being misunderstood.  Further clarification was needed to show that it was the County Council’s choice to apply proportionality to the Cabinet Committees (although it did not have to do so) and that this proportionality was to be varied by allowing each minority group to take up a seat on each of these Committees even if strict application of proportionality would not entitle them to do so.   The text of paragraph 3 (15) should be amended to clarify that this was to be the arrangement for all minority groups rather than the “Labour Group.”

            (g)       Paras 7 and 8: As each Member who sat on a Cabinet Committee was automatically serving on the executive side, there was a risk that there might be difficulties in identifying a sufficient number of Members to sit on the “Overview and Scrutiny Committee.”

            (h)        Para 8:  Whilst recognising that the term “Overview and Scrutiny Committee” was set out in section 21 of the Local Government Act 2000, the text of this paragraph should be written in such a manner as to clarify that this Committee may not be called by that name and that it would only carry out the scrutiny function i.e. to call in for scrutiny decisions made but not yet called in by the Executive.

(i)         The Member Role Description of a Chairman of a  ...  view the full minutes text for item 42.