Venue: Darent Room, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone. View directions
Contact: Denise Fitch 01622 694269
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of the Meeting held on 17 January 2013 PDF 115 KB Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED that, subject to a correction to Min 44 (8) to read ‘St James’ Palace’, the minutes of the meeting held on 17 January 2013 are approved as a correct record and they be signed by the Chairman. There were no matters arising. |
|
Portfolio Holder's and Corporate Director's update PDF 43 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 1. Mr Hill gave an oral update on the following issues:-
2. Ms Honey gave an oral update on the following issues:-
3. Mr Hill and Ms Honey responded to comments and questions from the Committee and the following points were highlighted:-
a) a recent meeting of the Ashford Youth Advisory Group had received a good presentation by the new drug and alcohol service provider, and a further progress report had been requested from them in June or July;
b) it was requested that all Members be given a briefing on the Social Fund so they can familiarise themselves with how it works and be able to advise their local communities. Ms Honey replied that briefings were planned for the near future;
c) the new Edenbridge Centre had been visited by a local Member shortly before re-opening and had been described as ‘excellent’;
d) Mr Hill’s congratulations to ... view the full minutes text for item 54. |
|
Additional documents: Minutes: 1. Mr Hill introduced the report and reminded the Committee that Sandgate and Sherwood were the first two of a number of libraries for which the responsibility for the day-to-day running of library services will need a formal decision. Ms Anley added that KCC would retain the statutory obligation to monitor service delivery and provide book stock and resources; what will change as a result of the proposed decisions is the delivery of front-line service to customers. She and Mr Pearson responded to comments and questions from the Committee and the following points were highlighted:-
a) Members were encouraged by the scale and largely positive nature of the responses received to the consultation;
b) lack of confidence was expressed that the community-run services at Sherwood would work as well as they would at Sandgate, and that sufficient volunteers would be available. Ms Anley assured Members that, as the Sherwood library was located in the TN2 community centre, she was confident of there being sufficient volunteers available to staff it. Mr Pearson added that Tunbridge Wells Borough Council was fully engaged with the changes, had agreed to extend the library opening hours to match those of the TN2 centre and had already identified volunteers;
c) one Member related the experience of a lady trying to access facilities for library users who are hard of hearing and the apparent lack of training that desk staff had been given about these facilities. Ms Anley undertook to look into the issue and act upon the comments made, and assured Members that volunteers would be trained to the same level as front-of-house library staff; and
d) the same lady, however, had praised the new Kent History and Library Centre, describing it as ‘exemplary’.
2. RESOLVED that the decisions proposed to be taken by the Cabinet Member for Communities, Customer Services and Improvement, to delegate the responsibility for the day-to-day running of the library services at Sandgate Library to Sandgate Parish Council, and the day-to-day running of the library services at Sherwood Library to Tunbridge Wells Borough Council, be endorsed.
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: 1. Mr Hill introduced the item and explained that a variation to the policy required a formal decision, and the proposed arrangement would lever in additional funds. Ms Doherty and Mr Hill responded to comments and questions from Members and the following points were highlighted:-
a) Big Society funding is not currently available to individuals, and KCC is keen to make more people aware of its availability, and to demonstrate active commitment to supporting small and medium enterprises;
b) the promotion of the KCC’s credit union was discussed recently by the Cabinet, and a question about whether or not the union was being adequately promoted was noted;
c) Members asked to be able to see the Kent Big Society Fund annual report from the Kent Community Foundation. Ms Doherty explained that it is currently only in a draft form but the final version would be reported to this Committee at its June meeting;
d) concern was expressed that the Fredericks Foundation charge a 5% fee and then an interest rate of 15%, and that this might lead to applicants using this as a ‘last ditch’ attempt to obtain finance. This sort of applicant is perhaps not the sort that KCC would want to support. Ms Doherty explained that the KCC has no direct control over the lending model and rates charged. Finance is targeted to applicants who cannot access finance elsewhere, who are thus a higher-risk group; and
e) other Members commented that the short-term, small-scale loans involved suggest that the interest rates referred to are manageable. Surely the lender would not agree a loan if they did not feel the applicant could manage the repayments. In a difficult economic climate, when many small businesses are having trouble securing finance, this source of funding will be an asset.
2. RESOLVED that:-
a) the decision proposed to be taken by the Cabinet Member for Communities, Customer Services and Improvement, to allow investment of a one-off donation of £130,000 from the Kent Big Society Fund to support the development of a micro-finance hub in Kent, managed by the Fredericks Foundation, be endorsed; and
b) a report be made to the Committee’s next meeting on the final response from the Kent Community Foundation.
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: 1. Mr Hill and Ms Phillips introduced the report and explained that the proposal would be subject to extensive public consultation and an exhibition. The principles of the leasehold agreement set out in the report would need to be in place before the lessee could continue to the planning application stage in the early summer of 2013 for a woodland burial site, and would be finally signed only if planning permission were granted. Mr Hill and Ms Phillips responded to comments and questions from Members and the following points were highlighted:-
a) the proposed leasehold agreement brings an income stream to the County Council. Although the percentage of the income from the site that the KCC will take has not yet been negotiated, some level of profit will be locked in;
b) positive comments had been received from the local KCC Member, particularly about the public facilities at the site, which will be available for community use; and
c) the Committee acknowledged and thanked Ms Phillips for the extensive work and commitment that she had given to the project.
2. RESOLVED that the decision proposed to be taken by the Cabinet Member for Communities, Customer Services and Improvement, to agree to the change of use of White Horse Wood Country Park and the development of a 99-year lease of the site to Greenacres Ltd, and to delegate authority to enter into the contract to Director of Property and Infrastructure Support to enable its implementation, be endorsed.
|
|
Customer & Communities Performance Dashboard and Deep Dive on Troubled Families - Year One PDF 81 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: 1. Mr Hill and Mr Hallett introduced the dashboard and explained the two changes which had been made to the performance targets since last reporting to the Committee:- · the requirement that all deaths be registered within five days had been replaced by a requirement that everyone wishing to report a death should be offered an appointment to do so within five days. · a new performance indicator had been added, to measure satisfaction of users with the KCC website.
Officers responded to comments and questions from Members on the dashboard and the following points were highlighted:-
a) one Member confirmed that he had indeed been offered an appointment within five days to register a relative’s death;
b) the number of civil wedding ceremonies at KCC premises has increased since November 2012, going against the national trend. Officers undertook to include information in the next report on the number of other ceremonies (eg funerals) taking place, as well as data on the number of church weddings compared to civil ceremonies;
c) the new performance indicator which measures net satisfaction of users with the KCC website surveys 2% of users, across all areas of KCC services. The survey is worded very carefully so it is anonymous. The Society of IT Managers has increased KCC’s website’s star rating from 2 to 4 stars in the last three years;
d) patterns of use of the library service are changing, with increasing use of virtual ‘visits’ and e.books, and data on these types of use will be included in future dashboards; and
e) concern was expressed about reduced contacts with young people, but officers explained that this was not related to the way in which services are commissioned. Youth work activity can be presented district by district in future dashboards so Members can see the patterns in their local areas.
2. Mr Weiss, Mr Algar, Ms Slaven and Ms Honey then introduced the deep dive report on the Kent Troubled Families programme and highlighted the following key points:- · the programme is part of a national project, targeted at families who have may have some or all of the following identifying characteristics; intergenerational worklessness, involvement in youth crime, anti-social behaviour and children who have more than 3 unauthorised absences from school in any one year. The Programme aims to change the lives of the families and the way in which they are supported. · 2,560 families have been identified in Kent, and in the first year Kent aimed to work with 1,082 families. 12 Family Intervention Project (FIP) workers have been recruited to work across the county. · KCC has a strategic lead with 12 locally-based projects. · KCC works with partners to deliver the Programme, but controls the funding. · the programme aims to develop a key professional role working with each partner agency to establish a single point of contact for families. · a maximum of £4,000 of government funding is currently available per family. This is phased within a Payment by Results model and ... view the full minutes text for item 58. |
|
Customer & Communities Directorate & Portfolio Financial Monitoring 2012/13 PDF 153 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 1. Mr Tilson introduced the report and explained that the outturn presented to the Committee was in relation to the most recent forecast of the expenditure for the year to March 2013, based on actual costs incurred as at the end of Quarter 3, ie the end of December. The significant changes to the monitoring since the last meeting were summarised and Mr Tilson referred to the detailed explanations within the report.
2. RESOLVED that the revenue and capital forecast variances from budget for 2012/13 for the Customer & Communities Portfolio, based on the third quarter’s full monitoring report to Cabinet, be noted.
|
|
Kent County Council Olympic and Paralympic Legacy Plan PDF 59 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: 1. Mr Hill and Mr Hespe introduced the report and emphasised the need to maintain momentum to secure the Olympic and Paralympic legacy. The Legacy Plan sets ambitious targets and shares responsibility for its delivery across all service areas of the County Council. A Cross-Directorate Olympic Committee is chaired by Mr Hill. Since publication of the report, section 4 a) i of the plan - ‘Key Actions by Sector’ – had been amended to read ‘place a statutory duty on local authorities to consider provision of sport and physical activity services’. The Plan will be web-based; it is not proposed to produce a public-facing paper document.
2. Mr Hespe and Mr Hill responded to comments and questions from Members and the following points were highlighted:-
a) the clarity of the programme was complimented. Its targets appear achievable, and it is good that its implementation involves the whole County Council;
b) Kent had provided a record 28 athletes for the Olympics and Paralympics, after providing structures for their development. A condition of the Free Access to National Level Sports People (FANS) initiative, managed by KCC, is that the top sports people agree to make themselves available for local community events at no, or minimal, charge. Mr Hespe undertook to advise one questioner of how to engage a top performer to speak at a youth group meeting;
c) the Plan is well timed to coincide with an imminent announcement about funding for PE in Primary Schools, and supports the training of Primary School teachers to deliver good quality PE. However, the precise scale and timeframe of government funding for PE is not yet known; and
d) a view was expressed that more explicit mention of disabled people should be made, and Mr Hespe agreed to look into this.
3. RESOLVED that the Kent County Council Olympic and Paralympic Legacy Plan be welcomed and endorsed, and its implementation be supported.
|
|
The Kent Cultural Strategy PDF 77 KB Additional documents: Minutes: RESOLVED that the approach being taken by Kent County Council to implement, oversee and monitor the achievement of the Kent Cultural Strategy be acknowledged.
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes: 1. Mr Terry and Mr Harwood introduced the report and explained that ash dieback (Chalarafraxinea) has been a major challenge for KCC and its partners for the 4 – 5 months since the start of the outbreak. Emergency Planning is taking a lead role alongside Highways in tackling it. They highlighted key points as follows:-
· ash diebackcan affect street trees (of which, there are approximately 20,000 in the county) and trees in the KCC estate, eg on school sites. · the stability of ash trees is poor, and they can fall quite suddenly once dead. · an advice leaflet for schools has been published, which has been commended by the Department for Communities and Local Government. · Kent Trading Standards have been targeting rogue traders who seek to capitalise on the situation by offering unqualified advice and tree surgery services to householders and landowners. Some trees have a natural resistance to the condition and may not need to be felled. · trees coming into leaf in the spring will raise the public profile of the issue.
They responded to comments and questions from Members and the following points were highlighted:-
a) pre-emptive felling is not recommended by DEFRA as some trees are only slightly affected and may be able to survive the outbreak;
b) the public is advised to be vigilant and to monitor local trees. The Forestry Commission’s website and posters and a helpline number are all easy to find. Advisory leaflets will be made more widely available to raise public awareness in spring, and DEFRA will issue more guidance later in March;
c) KCC is working with landowners as part of its partnership arrangements. The AONB team liaises with landowners while Emergency Planning takes on a command and control role. KCC is also working with Martin Ward, the national lead on ash dieback;
d) it is not yet quite clear to what extent aerial spread has contributed to the outbreak; it could possibly have entered the country on nursery stock imported from mainland Europe;
e) it is possible that trees felled in dealing with the outbreak could be used as biomass fuel or in domestic wood burners. In that way, some small benefit could be gained from a bad situation;
f) an established system run by the Highways teams can identify and contact landowners, but some who are difficult to trace and/or who wish to avoid the effort and expense of clearing infected trees will need to be pursued and compelled to act. KCC has ... view the full minutes text for item 62. |
|
Vote of Thanks Additional documents: Minutes: 1. The Cabinet Member reminded Members that this was the last meeting of the Committee before the County Council elections in May. He thanked Members for their work on the Committee and the Chairman for her leadership of it.
2. The Chairman thanked the Cabinet Member for his comments and added her own thanks to him and the Committee Members for their support during her Chairmanship.
|