Minutes:
(Item 5 – Report by the Cabinet Member for Finance and Business, Mr John Simmonds and the Corporate Director of Finance and Procurement, Mr Andy Wood)
Cabinet received a report of the Member and officer named above, the purpose of which was to detail, and seek agreement to, changes to the Council’s Annual Treasury Strategy as originally agreed by Cabinet in January 2012. Mr Simmonds introduced the report to Cabinet and in particular referred to the following details contained within it:
Following a question
from the Leader of the County Council, Mr Carter, regarding the
figures quoted within the report, the Corporate Director for
Finance and Performance confirmed that they were separate from the
Pension Fund which had its own banking arrangements and treasury
management strategy. Therefore any
strategy agreed today would be relevant only to the main KCC
budget.
Mr Dance further elaborate don this theme and reported conversations that took place at a recent meeting on local authority investment that had taken place in London. Here it had been reported that Canadian firms had used pension fund monies to invest in long term projects expected to return profits, such as infrastructure projects, and that this would be of benefit to the efforts to create economic upturn England should the rules be adjusted to allow it.
RECORD OF DECISION:
CABINET DECISIONS on Treasury Strategy Update 17 September 2012 |
|
1. |
That the addition of the Australian and Canadian banks, specified in the appendix to the report, be agreed.
|
2. |
That in relation to the additions to the Counter party list agreed at 1. a limit of £25m in any one bank and a total of £50m in any one country, be agreed.
|
3. |
That a 5 year deposit in Lloyds TSB to a maximum of £12m, in order to establish the Local Authority Mortgage Scheme, be agreed.
|
REASON |
|
1. |
In order to increase options for investment should the rating agency further reduce the ratings of UK banks.
|
2. |
In order to protect new investments from economic downturn in the countries named or from institutional failure at any of the named banks.
|
3. |
In order to fulfil the terms required by Lloyds and facilitate the establishment of the scheme.
|
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDERED |
None. |
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST |
None. |
DISPENSATIONS GRANTED |
None. |
Supporting documents: