(Report by Mr Dance, Cabinet Member for Regeneration &
Economic Development, Mr Cockburn, Corporate Director Business
Strategy & Support)
(Ms
J Hansen, Finance Business Partner, Business Strategy and Support
and Mr D Shipton, Head of Financial Strategy, was present for this
item)
1.
The Chairman invited the Head of Financial
Strategy, Mr Shipton, to
introduce the report. Mr Shipton advised the following:
- The timing of this Cabinet Committee
and some others was difficult as the settlement was advised just
before Christmas and the final draft budget was planned to be
launched on Tuesday, 15 January when the Cabinet papers would be
published. As a result there was an offer for those Cabinet
Committees that meet before the launch to convene a Budget IMG to
discuss their draft budgets before the budget was discussed at
County Council on 14 February.
- The provisional settlement from the
Government was considered the most complicated settlement that the
County Council had received from the Government. This was due to the introduction of a new funding
arrangement with localising the business rates and transferring a
number of existing grants into the new business rate model which
made the comparison of this year and next year complicated.
- The headline for KCC was overall the
settlement was £16 million worse than was forecast as the
time of the launch of the budget consultation in September
2012. The issues did not affect this
Cabinet Committee’s portfolio as they were about the changes
to the arrangements on the early intervention of grant and the
funding for local authority central functions in relation to
Education where there were significant reductions that were not
anticipated.
- On a more positive note there had
been an announcement in the Autumn 2012
from the government that there would be an additional grant to
support freezing Council tax 2013/14. This was more than had been
forecast at the time of the budget consultation.
- In terms of the overall provisional
budget, at the time of the launch of the budget consultation it was
estimated that there would be £32 million additional spending
pressures, some of those pressures had also increased since the
launch of the budget consultation and it was anticipated that the
County Council would have in excess of £40 million additional
spending pressures to fund next year as well as those funding
reductions which meant that the overall position was the need to
make £83 to £84 million savings in the proposed budget
compared to the £60 million estimated at the time of the
launch of the budget consultation. This was all still subject to change before the final draft.
2.
The Chairman asked Members whether they wished to have another
Budget IMG meeting. A Member suggested
that it would depend on how the final draft budget figures affected
the budget of the Regeneration and Economic Development
portfolio’s budget.
3.
Ms Cooper advised that she understood that there were no further
pressures on the Regeneration and
Economic Development £3.9 million budget as 30% savings had
already been achieved over the 2 years.
Mr Shipton
indicated that there were no significant proposals affecting this
portfolio, following which Members agreed not to hold a further
Budget IMG meeting.
4.
RESOLVED that:-
a)
the verbal update by Mr Shipton on the late announcement of the provisional
local government finance settlement and the impact on budget
timetable be noted; and
b)
the issues raised in consultation and Cabinet’s response set
out in the report be noted.