- Victoria
Tovey (Assistant Director for Integrated Commissioning) introduced
the report which detailed performance against Key Performance
Indicators within Public Health commissioned services. Four areas
were performing above target whilst two were below the
target.
- Ms Tovey
noted the fall in performance against PH14 “number of mothers
receiving an antenatal contact by the health visiting
service”. Members asked for further
information:
- The
provider (KCHFT) had identified a data reporting error subsequent
to their move to a new IT system. That error had inflated their
previous performance, upon which the 24/25 targets had been set.
The error had been resolved, but that led to a decline in
performance against targets (i.e. less women had received
face-to-face contact from their health visitor than originally
recorded).
- Every
family known to the service had received a welcome letter from the
Health Visiting service and there was a significant amount of
universal support available. Vulnerable families and first-time
mothers were prioritised for visits.
- KCHFT
were paid as a block contract, as opposed to outcomes based, and
any underspends were discussed and either the money went back into
the Public Health Grant for re-investment, or the funding was
reallocated to other public health activities.
- As to why
the data error had not been discovered sooner, Ms Tovey explained a
rolling 12-month target was used and the base line fluctuated in
line with birth rates. It was therefore not immediately obvious
when looking at the declining performance against target.
- National
staff shortages meant the service ran a risk-based approach,
prioritising other activities in the service over the antenatal
contacts (for example, safeguarding visits) as individuals were
under the care of maternity services. However, there was an open
offer in place for anyone requesting support, and services
including Family Hubs and Midwifery also provided
care.
- Consideration was being given to centralising the antenatal
offer within the service to reduce instances of antenatal visits
being de-prioritised in locations with lower staff
numbers.
3.
In response
to questions around the lower number of people attending an NHS
Health Check than being invited for one, it was
said:
a.
The Health
Checks program was stopped during the Covid-19 pandemic and once it
re-started progress varied across primary care providers. The
2024/25 target was increased to reflect the over-achievement of the
2023/24 target.
b.
To increase
attendance, various pilots were underway, including a campaign
looking at the wording used in communications to different groups
of people.
c.
An audit had
been undertaken into the individuals that did not respond to
invitations to understand the barriers. The outcomes were being
used to inform future communications. Following a question around
the number of people setting a quit date for smoking, Ms Tovey
explained that the service was evidence based (NICE guidelines) but
there were a number of other initiatives helping to improve
effectiveness. There was an aspiration to use linked data (using
NHS numbers to anonymously monitor whether an individual’s
outcomes have improved since using a service).
4.
RESOLVED
that the performance of Public Health commissioned services in Q1
2024/2025 be noted.