ABANDONED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Update:
Decision due date changed from 01/06/2013 to 22/07/2014.
REASON: Negotiations continue between the relevant stakeholders to amend the agreement relating to JTB's.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To seek approval of an updated Joint Transportation Board (JTB) Agreement with District Councils.
The existing agreement is out of date and needs to be revised to reflect changes to the County Council’s constitution.
In addition amendments will be sought to the voting rights of Parish Council representatives as per the recommendations of Kent Association of Local Councils and endorsed by the EHW Cabinet Committee in December 2013.
BS4K - JTB’s are an important local mechanism for discussing highway/transport matters. In this context, JTBs meet Kent County Council’s Localism Agenda.
There are no impacts, costs or risks relating to the proposed decision
Decision type: Non-key
Decision status: Abandoned
Division affected: (All Division);
Notice of proposed decision first published: 16/02/2013
Reason for urgency:
N/a
Department: Growth, Environment & Transport
Contact: David Hall, Future Highways Manager e-mail: david.hall@kent.gov.uk Tel: 01622 221081 david.hall@kent.gov.uk Tel: 01622 221081.
Consultees
All JTBs will be consulted on the proposals before the decision will be put to the Cabinet Member for EHW.
The consultation will take place February/March 2013 JTB meetings
An Equalities Impact Assessment will not be conducted
All County Members will be informed
The matter has been considered and the recommendations endorsed by the Environment, Highways and Waste Cabinet Committee at it’s meeting of 10 January 2013.
The matter is not referred to in the Business Plan or Medium Term Capital programme
Financial implications: David Hall Future Highways Manager e-mail: david.hall@kent.gov.uk
Legal implications: 13/00038
Equalities implications: Not a key decision