A) Authorise additional expenditure to enact a 12-month extension of the Direct Payment Support Service from 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025.
B) Delegate to the Corporate Director for Children, Young People and Education to enter into any agreements required to implement the Decision in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Integrated Childrens Services.
Reason for Decision:
As part of the support planning process, Direct Payments (DPs) are offered to individuals to provide a greater choice and control over their care and support arrangements. They are monetary payments that can be made to individuals to meet some or all of their eligible support needs. The legislative context is set out in the Care Act 2014, section 117(2c) of the Mental Health Act 1983, the Care and Support (DP) Regulations 2014 and the Children and Families Act 2014.
The Children, Young People and Education Directorate commissions the Direct Payment Support Service with a not-for-profit provider of Children’s and Young People Services The service is open to:
Parents and carers of disabled children
Parents and carers of children with special educational needs
Young people aged 16-25 with special educational needs
Young disabled people aged 16-25
The Key Decision to commission the Direct Payment Support Service was taken on the 30 October 2018. The Decision (Decision - 18/00055 - Direct Payment Support Service (kent.gov.uk) provided for a three-year fixed term with two twelve-month extension periods within a maximum budget of £1.7 million over the five-year term. On 16 December 2022 the Cabinet Member for Integrated Children’s Services took a Decision (Decision - 22/00104 - Extension of the Direct Payment Support Service Contract (kent.gov.uk) to authorise additional expenditure to enact the final allowable extension to the contract and increase capacity to meet growing demand.
Consultation with Adult Social Care and Health (ASCH) has also been ongoing to ensure we consider their position and plans for the Adult DP service. As a part of the Making a Difference Everyday programme, ASCH is redesigning their self-directed support offer, and the opportunity to align the two DP services to create an integrated service for both CYPE and ASCH was suggested. The development of a ‘whole council approach’ to delivering DP services was supported in principle due to potential advantages such as cost efficiencies and a smooth transition between CYPE and ASCH.
Some of the service elements being scoped by ASCH align with the Direct Payment Support Services for Children and Young People. A potential joint commissioning exercise has emerged, which could offer KCC better value for money and create greater cohesion across services.
There is currently insufficient information available about ASCH's future trajectory and therefore, CYPE cannot make an informed recommendation about whether this option is viable. More time is required to sufficiently scope and engage the market to ascertain if aiming for an integrated service in Kent is feasible.
Options (other options considered but discarded)
Option 1: Do nothing. The Direct Payment Support Service contract will cease on the 31 March 2024 and CYPE will have to make alternative plans for the administration and support for CYPE Direct Payments. Currently there are no arrangements in CYPE to undertake this function and it would not be possible to develop in-house capacity within the timeframe. This option is discounted.
Option 2: CYPE Commission the Direct Payment Support Service independently of ASCH. There may be a missed opportunity for an integrated service, and lost economies of scale due to separate procurement activity. This option is discounted.
Framing Kent’s Future Council Strategy 2022-2026:
Priority 4: New models of care and support: Our commitment is to reshape our commissioning practice to ensure we build strategic partnerships with our providers, through earlier engagement, more consistent and proactive commissioning practice, and a stronger focus on co-designing services.
Our commitment is to support the most vulnerable children and families in our county, ensuring our social work practice supports manageable caseloads, reflective learning, joined up safeguarding and effective corporate parenting arrangements.
Decision type: Key
Reason Key: Affects more than two Electoral Divisions;
Decision status: For Determination
Notice of proposed decision first published: 07/11/2023
Decision due: Not before 7th Dec 2023 by Cabinet Member for Integrated Children's Services
Reason: To allow the required 28 day notice period under Executive Decision arrangements
Lead member: Cabinet Member for Integrated Children's Services
Lead director: Kevin Kasaven
Department: Education & Young People's Services
Contact: Christy Holden, Head of Children's Commissioning Email: email@example.com or 03000 415436.
The Children’s and Young People Cabinet Committee considered and endorsed the decision on 21 November 2023.
The proposed decision will be considered at the Children’s, Young People and Education Cabinet Committee on 21 November 2023.
Financial implications: The costs for the contract are funded from the Children’s Disability 0-18 Commissioning Revenue Budget, with the increase relating to inflationary pressures, to be identified as part of the medium-term financial plan. The cost of delivering the service over the five-year period, 1 April 2018 – 31 March 2024 is £2,015,087
Legal implications: Direct Payments for parents or carers of disabled children are a statutory duty under the Children Act 1989 as amended by Sections 17A (inserted by the Health and Social Care Act 2001) and 17B (inserted by the Carers and Disabled Children Act 2000) The legal advice has concluded that the Council has reasonable grounds to rely upon Regulation 72(1)(b) PCR 2015 to justify the extension beyond the optional extension periods already expressly provided in the contracts. This is on the basis that a change of providers cannot be made for economic or technical reasons and would cause significant inconvenience for the Council.
Equalities implications: Equalities implications: An equality impact assessment has been undertaken and no issues have been identified at this stage. The equality impact assessment shall be kept under constant review as this project continues. Data Protection implications: There are no changes to the requirements of the contract.